Daniel Bagnolini vs Cezar Cretu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W L W W W L
Form
W W L W W L L L L LHead-2-Head: Bagnolini 1 - 0 Cretu
They have played 3 sets in total, with Bagnolini winning 2 and Cretu winning 1. The last match between Bagnolini and Cretu was at the M25 Santa margherita di Pula, 23-04-2025, First, Clay with Daniel Bagnolini getting the victory 6-3 4-6 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Bagnolini | 1 |
| Cezar Cretu | 0 |
M25 Santa margherita di Pula(23-04-2025)
6
3
4
6
7
5
| Bagnolini | Stats | Cretu |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (5-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (6-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 893 | Ranking | 361 |
| 873 | Highest Rank | 288 |
| 22 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 7 |
| 53% (77-68) | Career Total W/L | 68% (254-122) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Andreescu PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Daniel Bagnolini
Player
Cezar Cretu
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
120)
0
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
6
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
10 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
50%
(
43 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
63 of
120)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 14 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 3:8:23 | Average Match Time | 3:8:23 |
| 49% (42/86) | 1st Serve % | 66% (79/120) |
| 60% (25/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (47/79) |
| 41% (18/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 24% (10/41) |
| 50% (9/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 64% (7/11) |
| 53% (63/120) | Return Points Win % | 50% (43/86) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Bagnolini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Daniel Bagnolini
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Bagnolini
Player
Cezar Cretu
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
120)
0
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
6
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
10 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
50%
(
43 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
63 of
120)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Bagnolini
Player
Stefano D'Agostino
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
79)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Cruz Martin Manzano
Player
Daniel Bagnolini
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Daniel Bagnolini
39%
(
18 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Cezar Cretu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Bagnolini
Player
Cezar Cretu
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
120)
0
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
6
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
10 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
50%
(
43 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
63 of
120)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Cezar Cretu
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Cezar Cretu
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
66 of
88)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Cezar Cretu
42%
(
29 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adria Soriano Barrera
Player
Cezar Cretu
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
62
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(10) 6-7(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Pavel Verbin
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Stefan Latinovic
70%
(
78 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Cezar Cretu
55%
(
48 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
95
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Mili Poljicak
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Diogo Marques
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (77/68) | Win/Loss | 68% (254/122) |
| 52% (167/157) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (536/314) |
| 50% (1446/1437) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (4369/3590) |
| 50% (13/13) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (36/24) |
| 54% (63/54) | Clay Win/Loss | 69% (215/96) |
| 50% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 48 | Aces Total | 682 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 292 | Total Double Faults | 763 |
| 1:5:56 | Average Match Time | 1:23:47 |
| 353.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 448.7 |
| 67% (3757/5640) | 1st Serve % | 64% (12844/20114) |
| 61% (2276/3757) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (8389/12844) |
| 46% (872/1883) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3620/7270) |
| 46% (293/632) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1089/2368) |
| 42% (2404/5688) | Return Points Win % | 44% (8899/20338) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100% (4/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 53% (28/25) |
| 53% (77/67) | Futures W/L | 70% (222/95) |
| 53% (76/143) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (247/368) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (12/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (46/87) |
| 61% (22/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (72/107) |
| 94% (70/66) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (234/215) |
| 6% (70/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (234/19) |
| 15% (75/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (141/38) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
